The Number of Renter Households is Growing Three Times Faster Than Homeowner Households
- The number of renter households grew 2.7% in the third quarter, the second biggest year-over-year gain since 2015. The number of homeowner households grew 0.9%.
- Renter households have formed faster than homeowner households for the past four quarters as the cost of buying a home rose faster than the cost of renting.
- The national rentership rate remained steady at 34.4%.
- San Jose, CA, Los Angeles and New York have the highest shares of renter households, while Cape Coral, FL, Charleston, SC and Columbia, SC have the lowest.
The number of renter households rose 2.7%, in the third quarter year over year, to a record 45.6 million. That’s three times faster than the 0.9% increase in homeowner households, which now total a record 86.9 million.
The 2.7% increase—representing 1.18 million additional renter households— was the second fastest pace since 2015, only trailing the first quarter’s 2.8% rate.
!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r=0;r<e.length;r++)if(e[r].contentWindow===a.source){var i=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";e[r].style.height=i}}}))}();
This is based on a Redfin analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data going back to 1994. A renter household is defined as one where the head of the household reports to the Census that they are renting out the property, while a homeowner household is one where the head of household reports they own the property. The number of homeowner and renter households are both at record highs because the U.S. population is at a record high.
Renter households have formed faster than homeowner households for the past four quarters as the cost of buying a home rose faster than the cost of renting.
The median asking rent was up 0.6% year over year in September, but rents have remained largely flat for the past two years—becoming more affordable as wages grew at around 4%.
In contrast, home prices climbed 6% year over year in September and have grown more than 10% in the past two years. Highlighting the affordability barriers that exist for prospective homeowners, just 2.5% of U.S. homes changed hands in the first eight months of 2024—the lowest rate in decades.
“Affordable housing has been at the forefront of this election cycle because so many people are struggling to see how they will ever become homeowners—especially those from younger generations, ” said Redfin Senior Economist Sheharyar Bokhari. “With home prices at record highs and mortgage rates remaining elevated, renting is increasingly the only viable choice for many young people and families. Building more homes will help address that, but we also have to recognize that Gen Z and future generations may not view homeownership as a life goal and the rentership rate may continue to rise for years to come.”
New multifamily units are being completed at a record pace
Part of the reason rents have remained stable—and renting has become more attractive to many—is the boom in multifamily construction over the past two years. The country is adding new multifamily housing units at an annual rate of 647,000 (as of the third quarter)—the fastest pace in records dating back to 1994.
!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r=0;r<e.length;r++)if(e[r].contentWindow===a.source){var i=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";e[r].style.height=i}}}))}();
The recent boom in multifamily construction helped meet surging demand in some areas—especially in Sun Belt states—but builders are now pumping the brakes. Permits to build multifamily housing units were down 16% year over year in September, and down 47% from the post-pandemic high in February 2023—which was the highest mark in nearly 40 years.
More than half the households in San Jose and Los Angeles rent
Nationwide, just over one-third (34.4%) of households in the U.S. are renter households—a figure that has remained the same for the past three quarters.
The rentership share is highest in metros in California and in New York City, where homes are generally more expensive to buy. San Jose, CA has a rentership rate of 52%, the highest among the 75 largest U.S. metropolitan areas. It’s followed by Los Angeles (50.8%), New York (49.1%), San Diego (48%) and Fresno, CA (47.4%).
Rentership rates are lower in metros where, historically, it’s been more affordable to buy a home. In Cape Coral, FL, 21.8% of households are renter households—the lowest share among the metros Redfin analyzed. It’s followed by Charleston, SC (23.7%), Columbia, SC (24.5%), Allentown, PA (27.2%) and Detroit (28.2%).
Metro-Level Rentership Rate Summary: Q3 2024
Table includes 75 largest U.S. metropolitan areas
| U.S. metro area | Rentership rate
(Q3 2024) |
Rentership rate
(Q3 2023) |
Homeownership rate (Q3 2024) | Homeownership rate (Q3 2023) |
| Akron, OH | 35.0% | 44.7% | 65.0% | 55.3% |
| Albany, NY | 28.4% | 35.3% | 71.6% | 64.7% |
| Albuquerque, NM | 31.1% | 30.9% | 68.9% | 69.1% |
| Allentown, PA | 27.2% | 24.8% | 72.8% | 75.2% |
| Atlanta, GA | 32.8% | 32.7% | 67.2% | 67.3% |
| Austin, TX | 44.3% | 39.3% | 55.7% | 60.7% |
| Baltimore, MD | 31.0% | 26.6% | 69.0% | 73.4% |
| Baton Rouge, LA | 32.0% | 31.9% | 68.0% | 68.1% |
| Birmingham, AL | 29.9% | 30.7% | 70.1% | 69.3% |
| Boston, MA | 40.0% | 41.5% | 60.0% | 58.5% |
| Bridgeport, CT | 33.3% | 34.0% | 66.7% | 66.0% |
| Buffalo, NY | 38.2% | 38.4% | 61.8% | 61.6% |
| Cape Coral, FL | 21.8% | 13.3% | 78.2% | 86.7% |
| Charleston, SC | 23.7% | 29.9% | 76.3% | 70.1% |
| Charlotte, NC | 41.2% | 37.3% | 58.8% | 62.7% |
| Chicago, IL | 31.8% | 34.4% | 68.2% | 65.6% |
| Cincinnati, OH | 30.0% | 30.0% | 70.0% | 70.0% |
| Cleveland, OH | 28.3% | 35.6% | 71.7% | 64.4% |
| Columbia, SC | 24.5% | 27.8% | 75.5% | 72.2% |
| Columbus, OH | 40.1% | 42.0% | 59.9% | 58.0% |
| Dallas, TX | 38.8% | 38.2% | 61.2% | 61.8% |
| Dayton, OH | 31.1% | 40.7% | 68.9% | 59.3% |
| Denver, CO | 35.2% | 32.1% | 64.8% | 67.9% |
| Detroit, MI | 28.2% | 25.2% | 71.8% | 74.8% |
| Fresno, CA | 47.4% | 44.2% | 52.6% | 55.8% |
| Grand Rapids, MI | 34.7% | 35.2% | 65.3% | 64.8% |
| Greensboro, NC | 39.0% | 38.4% | 61.0% | 61.6% |
| Hartford, CT | 32.5% | 33.1% | 67.5% | 66.9% |
| Houston, TX | 38.9% | 37.2% | 61.1% | 62.8% |
| Indianapolis, IN | 29.4% | 27.4% | 70.6% | 72.6% |
| Jacksonville, FL | 32.4% | 24.7% | 67.6% | 75.3% |
| Kansas City, MO | 33.4% | 37.2% | 66.6% | 62.8% |
| Knoxville, TN | 37.1% | 35.2% | 62.9% | 64.8% |
| Las Vegas, NV | 42.7% | 42.3% | 57.3% | 57.7% |
| Little Rock, AR | 41.9% | 40.5% | 58.1% | 59.5% |
| Los Angeles, CA | 50.8% | 49.1% | 49.2% | 50.9% |
| Louisville, KY | 29.0% | 31.5% | 71.0% | 68.5% |
| Memphis, TN | 46.1% | 39.2% | 53.9% | 60.8% |
| Miami, FL | 39.4% | 38.9% | 60.6% | 61.1% |
| Milwaukee, WI | 38.1% | 40.6% | 61.9% | 59.4% |
| Minneapolis, MN | 32.4% | 24.7% | 67.6% | 75.3% |
| Nashville, TN | 32.5% | 28.0% | 67.5% | 72.0% |
| New Haven, CT | 34.7% | 31.5% | 65.3% | 68.5% |
| New Orleans, LA | 33.8% | 32.0% | 66.2% | 68.0% |
| New York, NY | 49.1% | 48.5% | 50.9% | 51.5% |
| North Port, FL | 32.3% | 35.0% | 67.7% | 65.0% |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 35.5% | 32.2% | 64.5% | 67.8% |
| Omaha, NE | 28.7% | 32.8% | 71.3% | 67.2% |
| Orlando, FL | 39.9% | 43.2% | 60.1% | 56.8% |
| Philadelphia, PA | 30.6% | 28.8% | 69.4% | 71.2% |
| Phoenix, AZ | 29.6% | 28.4% | 70.4% | 71.6% |
| Pittsburgh, PA | 32.1% | 31.5% | 67.9% | 68.5% |
| Portland, OR | 39.9% | 32.9% | 60.1% | 67.1% |
| Providence, RI | 36.0% | 37.1% | 64.0% | 62.9% |
| Raleigh, NC | 30.8% | 27.5% | 69.2% | 72.5% |
| Richmond, VA | 31.2% | 29.5% | 68.8% | 70.5% |
| Riverside, CA | 33.8% | 28.8% | 66.2% | 71.2% |
| Rochester, NY | 38.0% | 32.0% | 62.0% | 68.0% |
| Sacramento, CA | 38.3% | 36.6% | 61.7% | 63.4% |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 42.4% | 36.2% | 57.6% | 63.8% |
| San Antonio, TX | 35.0% | 34.7% | 65.0% | 65.3% |
| San Diego, CA | 48.0% | 47.3% | 52.0% | 52.7% |
| San Francisco, CA | 42.4% | 45.8% | 57.6% | 54.2% |
| San Jose, CA | 52.0% | 46.3% | 48.0% | 53.7% |
| Seattle, WA | 37.6% | 36.7% | 62.4% | 63.3% |
| St Louis, MO | 31.3% | 32.4% | 68.7% | 67.6% |
| Syracuse, NY | 37.9% | 37.4% | 62.1% | 62.6% |
| Tampa, FL | 29.6% | 30.0% | 70.4% | 70.0% |
| Toledo, OH | 30.1% | 21.4% | 69.9% | 78.6% |
| Tucson, AZ | 28.9% | 25.1% | 71.1% | 74.9% |
| Tulsa, OK | 32.1% | 35.4% | 67.9% | 64.6% |
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 39.6% | 35.3% | 60.4% | 64.7% |
| Virginia Beach, VA | 29.6% | 36.4% | 70.4% | 63.6% |
| Washington, DC | 36.1% | 35.9% | 63.9% | 64.1% |
| Worcester, MA | 31.8% | 33.5% | 68.2% | 66.5% |
| National—U.S.A. | 34.4% | 34% | 65.6% | 34% |
The post The Number of Renter Households is Growing Three Times Faster Than Homeowner Households appeared first on Redfin Real Estate News.
Categories
Recent Posts
